-
【GE CHENG News】Attribution of rights on the patent application by using other's technical secrets without permission
2025-05-05——(2020) Supreme People’s Court Final Civil Judgment No. 871In the case of patent attribution dispute between the appellant Tianjin Qingsong Huayao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Qingsong Company) and the appellee Huabei Medicine Hebei Huamin Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. (hereinaft -
【GE CHENG News】Interim measures for the processing of related examination businesses regarding the implementation of the revised Patent Law
2025-05-05Article 1Since June 1, 2021 (including that date, the same below), the patent applicant may submit the patent application requesting for protection of the product’s partial industrial design, in accordance withArticle 2 Paragraph 4 of the revised Patent Law, in the form of paper or offline electroni -
【GE CHENG News】The handling of implementer of the horizontal agreements demanding other implementers’ compensation for the so-called economic losses
2025-05-05——(2020) Supreme People’s Court Final Civil Judgment No. 1382 Monopoly Case of "Brick and Tile Association" In the monopoly dispute case including appellant Sichuan Yibin Wuqiao Building Materials Industry Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Wuqiao Company), Cao Peijun, Yibin Brick and Tile Associ -
【GE CHENG News】Interpretation of the number "one" in the claims
2025-05-05——(2020) Supreme People’s Court Final Civil Judgment No. 1070Shenzhen Chuzhidao Environmental Protection Hi-Tech Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Chuzhidao Company) is the patentee of the invention of "Dynamic Physical Shielding Purifier". Chuzhidao Company believed that the product being sued -
【GE CHENG News】Zhejiang's first judicial interpretation of punitive damages with "Wyeth" received 30.55 million yuan in compensation
2025-05-05On April 26, the 21st World Intellectual Property Day, the Zhejiang Higher People’s Court opened a second-instance trial and declared the first case applying to the Supreme People’s Court’sInterpretation on the Application of Punitive Damages to the Trial of Civil Cases of Infringement on Intellectu