-
【GE CHENG News】The consideration of "raising of questions" for the judgment of inventive step—(2020) Supreme People’s Court Final Administrative Judgment No. 183
2025-05-05【The main takeaway of the trial】The inventive step of a patent technical solution can derive from "solution to problems" or "raising of questions"; when the technical progress have difficulty in finding problems, if not consider whether the "raising of questions " is obvious or not for those of ordi -
【GE CHENG News】13,800 cases of administrative adjudication on patent infringement disputes were filed in the first half year in China
2025-05-05In the first half of the year, all intellectual property management departments in China steadily promoted the administrative adjudication on patent infringement disputes, focusing on key areas online and offline, and obtained good achievement and efficiency. Cases of administrative adjudication of -
【GE CHENG News】The main statistics of the first half year of 2021 issued by CNIPA
2025-05-05In the first half of the year,339, 000 cases of invention patent were authorized in China. As of the end of June 2021, there were 3, 324,000 cases of valid invention patent, a year-on-year increase of 23.0%, and 33, 300 cases of accepted PCT international patent application, a year-on-year increase -
【GE CHENG News】Protection of utility model patent rights applied in terms of the same technical solution on the same day after the rejection of an invention patent application
2025-05-05—(2020) Supreme People’s Court Final Civil Judgment No. 699If the party applied for invention patents and utility model patents of the same technical solution on the same day, the invention patent application was not authorized due to the lack of novelty or being determined not to involve inventive -
【GE CHENG News】The Supreme Court explicitly promised that sales infringement should also be responsible for compensation
2025-05-05In March this year, the Intellectual Property Court of the Supreme People’s Court made second-instance judgments in two cases of infringement of utility model patent rights, explicitly indicating that the accused infringers should bear civil liability for stopping the infringement and compensating f